Ocula MagazineContentsView All
Featured ContentView All
Art Taipei 2018 Ocula Report Art Taipei 2018 10 November 201810 Nov 2018 : Diana d’Arenberg for Ocula

'There is nothing more boring than the story of decline,' a journalist remarked at an art criticism panel I attended the evening before making the trip to see Art Taipei (26–29 October 2018). As I attended the opening night of Asia's oldest art fair, which celebrates its 25th anniversary this year, those words rang in my head. Wandering up and down...

Read More
Charwei Tsai Ocula Conversation Charwei Tsai

Taiwanese artist Charwei Tsai's memorising and compulsive writing of the Heart Sutra—a Buddhist scripture that distills the wisdom of impermanence—is at the heart of her practice. Over the past ten years, Tsai has moved from writing to drawing, photography, and film—a selection of which is being presented at the Centre for Chinese...

Read More
Crush at Para Site: What if you couldn’t have it? Ocula Report Crush at Para Site: What if you couldn’t have it? 10 November 201810 Nov 2018 : Hera Chan for Ocula

Drawn on paper by Oscar Chan Yik Long in gestural black ink strokes, Cupid (2015) greets visitors with a sinister toothy smile as they enter Para Site. The strikingly fearsome figure is positioned on the wall of the gallery's entrance, near one of Chen Dandizi's vertical neon tube lights, part of the series 'Tick Away' (2015), along which a...

Read More
Ocula Conversation

John Akomfrah in Conversation

Fawz Kabra New York 5 July 2018

John Akomfrah at his London studio, 2016. © Smoking Dogs Films. Photo: Jack Hems. Courtesy Lisson Gallery.

The polyphonic has been a guiding principle in John Akomfrah's work. As a founding member of the Black Audio Film Collective, which was active from 1982 to 1998, Akomfrah produced experimental documentaries and films that responded to growing social turmoil in 1980s Britain. The collective's first film essay, Handsworth Songs (1986), commissioned by the British public television broadcaster Channel 4, was a response to the riots in London and Handsworth, Birmingham, in 1985; it was made up of newsreel footage, archival photographs, and interviews to construct a multi-layered film that destabilised the mainstream 'regime of representation,' which racially profiled black communities in a discriminatory social environment within the conservative politics of the United Kingdom under Thatcher.

John Akomfrah, The Unfinished Conversation (2012). Exhibition view: John Akomfrah: Signs of Empire, New Museum, New York (20 June–2 September 2018). Courtesy Smoking Dogs Films and Lisson Gallery. Photo: Maris Hutchinson / EPW Studio.

Exploring ideas of culture, ideology, representation, identity, and politics through a collective working process provided Akomfrah with the language to expand upon these considerations, later creating Smoking Dogs Films in 1998 with Lina Gopaul and David Lawson, his former collective partners. Today, Akomfrah's installations consist of multi-channel moving image works that transcend traditional forms of broadcast, producing moving image compositions with sound and text that are informed by thinkers like cultural theorist Stuart Hall (1932–2014). His films are atmospheric and reflective, exhuming personal and collective memory, bringing in juxtapositions and dialogues between disparate moments and narratives throughout history. The Unfinished Conversation (2012) is a three-channel film installation reflecting on the cultural theorist's life—a mix of documentary footage and the artist's narrations. The multi-screen Vertigo Sea, which was first premiered at the 2015 Venice Biennale, considers histories of slavery, migration, and environmental crisis.

This conversation with Akomfrah was held on the occasion of his solo exhibition at the New Museum, Signs of Empire (20 June–2 September 2018), which presents early directorial work with the Black Audio Film Collective alongside recent works like Transfigured Night (2013/2018), a two-channel video installation that explores the relationship between the post-colonial subject and the state, through a 1896 German poem by Richard Dehmel, and a 1899 musical composition by Arnold Schoenberg.

John Akomfrah, Expeditions 1: Signs of Empire (1983) (Still). Single-channel 35mm colour Ektachrome slides transferred to video, sound. 26 min. © Smoking Dogs Films. Courtesy Lisson Gallery.

Could you talk about your experience as part of the Black Audio Film Collective. and how a dislocation of individual authorship allows for a sharing of risk taking?

The New York show has one of the first pieces that I worked on inside the Collective: the Tate slide work that we did over two years called 'Expeditions'. I was very happy when Massimiliano [Gioni] said that he wanted to include it because an unfinished conversation was set in motion regarding the desire to name ourselves in the collective title. It's unfinished because one of the many compulsions taken up in collectives and for being part of one remains this question of naming, and of finding a space either within a society or a state or town, call it what you will—finding this space of autonomy in which one can become.

We were a number of individuals with different parents from different parts of the African and Asian world, but we wanted to be black artists. The preconditions of being black artists was to choose a state in which we can name ourselves in that form, and without the collective, I'm afraid that would've been impossible. I also acquired modes of thinking that are ongoing, unfinished. It involves discourses, conversations that I have all the time with myself about the question of form, the nature of identity—political or otherwise—and the relevance of the work. Clearly this is not 1982, and if I were to start again and be part of a collective or chose to be part of a collective, we would probably operate in a slightly different way to the way Black Audio was constituted.

John Akomfrah, Expeditions 1: Signs of Empire (1983) (Still). Single-channel 35mm colour Ektachrome slides transferred to video, sound. 26 min. © Smoking Dogs Films. Courtesy Lisson Gallery.

Can we talk about the legacy of Stuart Hall and what you have described as a 'double inscription' in The Unfinished Conversation?

On the one hand, the work was an attempt at collaboration between Stuart and myself. The conceit was to open a space for a dialogue with him about the post-war period and the migrations of identity—racial and otherwise—in that period. Now, as that conversation proceeded, it became clear that in a way he was an emblematic example, and that situating his formation—political, psychic, cultural—at the centre of The Unfinished Conversation was one way the conversation between us could proceed with a degree of effectiveness.

Having decided that he would be the centre of the work, it was clear that it couldn't just be a biographical account of the post-war. We couldn't use him, his life, as the entire story of the emergence of the left. Other strategies needed to be found, which had some proximity to his life, but weren't exactly the same. I didn't want to reduce the entire backdrop of the historical or the political to the biography of one figure. I knew that we were going to have to do the two things at the same time, and that's what I initially meant by the double inscription. On the one hand, one would say something about the character, its formation, its impact and its influence. But one would also then want to say something about the backdrop to that character.

I can't think of any other way in which we could've done it. We managed to do something that was slightly more 'biographical' in a single-screen version that I made for the cinema called The Stuart Hall Project (2013).

John Akomfrah, The Unfinished Conversation (2012). Exhibition view: John Akomfrah: Signs of Empire, New Museum, New York (20 June–2 September 2018). Courtesy Smoking Dogs Films and Lisson Gallery. Photo: Maris Hutchinson / EPW Studio.

It seemed to me when we started The Unfinished Conversation, that if you opt for the tryptic form, that you were then necessarily involved with questions of discursivity, mixed economies, the dialogic, and the constant conversation between a number of elements simultaneously. I knew from the beginning that the minute I decided it would be something multiscreen, that we were going to have to find ways of literally filling that multiscreen with discordant elements; things that didn't necessarily sit in harmony with each other. And the trick, the whole point of the work, was to find the harmony, if you will.

How does The Unfinished Conversation connect with your experience in the Black Audio Film Collective, which saw you working together to address the regime of representation?

I think one of the things that was important for me was the question of the polyphonic. Stuart Hall was a quintessentially polyphonic figure who was very comfortable with sitting in all kinds of crossroads and intersections—situating his argument at a variety of crossroads. Now, one only does that with any confidence if one believes, profoundly, in the polyphonic. In other words, the ability to marshal an array of voices or at different registers, shall we say, in the service of a broader ideal, which is not reducible to its components.

The whole point of polyphony is that you have a kind of call and response, yin and yang—call it what you will. That was very much one of the organising principles by which all collectives strive to work, and The Black Audio was no exception. If you have more than three people together and they all decide that they will name their practice in the same way, then you are necessarily inviting the polyphonic into your life. The striking overlap between collective practice, which is premised on the polyphonic, and a political project initiated by a figure, meant that there were some overlapping affinities that could be explored.

John Akomfrah, The Unfinished Conversation (2012). Exhibition view: John Akomfrah: Signs of Empire, New Museum, New York (20 June–2 September 2018). Courtesy Smoking Dogs Films and Lisson Gallery. Photo: Maris Hutchinson / EPW Studio.

The first time I met Stuart, we invited him to come to our workshop because we were making the film Handsworth Songs about an area in England, Birmingham, that he had lived in and taught in from 1964 until the late seventies. So, the fact that we were invested in making a film about an area that he had worked in necessarily provided us with a sort of basis for a conversation. One of the reasons we had gone to Birmingham to make the film at all was in part to do with the fact that he had been there in the first place. So, you have these complicated overlaps that were the basis of the dialogue with him.

When I met Hall in person, there was this very same sense of déjà vu. It's slightly arrogant to say that we recognised him when we first met him, but it's true. He felt very familiar because we had already, for years, been reading his work. And I think there is something about the tensions, the ambiguities, and the turmoils in his life that perfectly mirrored our own. Here was a figure who was deemed the monument of the hybrid. He had come from Jamaica to attend college in England. He worried about the tension between the two worlds and navigating the spaces between the two as a figure who had arrived in England not necessarily being either black, white or English.

In other words, there were recognisable tensions for us. It was interesting to observe—both from afar and in close up—a figure whose life, thoughts, and activities had in some way been rehearsals for our own. Migrating ideas, concepts, ways of seeing and being from his work onto a collective project wasn't that difficult.

John Akomfrah, The Unfinished Conversation (2012). Three-channel HD video installation, 7.1 sound, colour. 45 min 48 sec. © Smoking Dogs Films. Courtesy Lisson Gallery.

You often speak about dualities, dialectics, indexes, juxtapositions and reflections when discussing approaches and strategies to image making. Could you talk about how you work with images in order to produce a dual situation of being present in the moment while allowing the viewer to imagine 'elsewhere'?

Every situation, every exhibition, sort of forces you to think about this in a slightly different way. We are dealing with practices of indexicality—temporal machineries that generate desire and thought and so on. It seems to me that part of what one needs to do with all image- and lens-based projects that have a kind of glow of an afterlife—let's call it the archival trace—is situate that material as something with its own legitimacy, with its own specificity, so that at the same time one can then tease it to have a dialogue with the present. It's only in the process of allowing the possibility for these migrations that other narratives emerge.

When things insist on the specificity of their moment and their desire to simply stay in those moments, one doesn't get that migration. Without that migration there is no possibility of further development. So, I am, in all humility, a servant of these things whether they are stories or photographs. I am a servant in a sense that I am here to basically recognise your ontological status and to confer on that status a certain amount of legitimacy. Once I've done that, or once we've agreed that this has happened, it seems to me that the other question we need to pose to those moments, things, or objects is: 'would you not like to come for a walk? Why don't we just go somewhere new, just for a moment?' It's a provisional request, not a permanent one. You are not going to be transformed into something other than what you are. But it seems to me that if you are able to step into this new space and respect it, something interesting will happen.

I have found that, over the years, most frames are sufficiently inquisitive and generous to make viewers want to take that walk. Usually when they don't, it's because it's not an appropriate moment. There are films that I saw 25 years ago in archival collections that I try to engage in other projects, but they simply refuse to budge, because the projects themselves, the demand, wasn't right for them. So: I start from this profoundly libertarian space, which says that all things are possible with images. But the moment and the conjunctions when they can circulate are circumscribed. There is freedom but there are also constraints, and one needs to recognise when the two are absolutely aligned to make something possible.

John Akomfrah, Transfigured Night (2013). Two-channel HD video installation, 5.1 sound, colour. 26 min 31 sec. © Smoking Dogs Films. Courtesy Lisson Gallery.

How does the form of the film essay relate to a strategy that often deals with irreconcilable contested histories? For example, your use of double screen, voiceover, text, and blending historical footage with your own in Transfigured Night.

I'm always placed in that camp, and I don't have a problem with that. I've learned more from film essays than just about any other cinematic form. The space in which I started with the collective, one that I thought I occupied, has to do with being fundamentally agnostic about the claims of either 'documentary footage' or 'fiction footage.' What we found in all our studies of early cinema is that there are ways in which the original document circulated in the time machine of the cinema. The early cinema from the late 1880s to the 1920s seemed to not really make a distinction between fiction and documentary, they were always the same. And so, because of that, this notion that somehow there are absolute demarcations between the two made no sense.

The film essay, for me, must start with the assumption that just about everything is open to a question or a reflection. And that covers the status of what you're watching, where it belongs, who is behind and in front of the camera, who is writing the voices, all of this stuff is up for grabs, and it's only up for grabs if you say to yourself in advance, 'I will not accept the categories that you're throwing at me as permanent ones. This is a fiction film, this is a good documentary,' or 'this is a bad one.' All of those facile demarcations have to be under scrutiny, under question, or have to be approached from a place of profound agnosticism before anything happens, really.

John Akomfrah, Transfigured Night (2013). Two-channel HD video installation, 5.1 sound, colour. 26 min 31 sec. © Smoking Dogs Films. Courtesy Lisson Gallery.

I think I was blessed to be part of a collective who started off making slide-tapes and looking at the histories of colonial fantasy for us to realise that there were these continuities that connected narratives across lines that were supposed to be clearly drawn—from novels to essays, films, travel writings, diaries and letters. There were overlaps, and there were discontinuities, too. Clearly there were differences between a letter written privately to a husband and a travel journal, which was published. But there were also incredible continuities and overlaps between them, and that's one of the things we set out to do. Works like The Unfinished Conversation and Transfigured Night are happy to cull elements from the newsreel—pulling from the history of German serial music, or the writings of Fanon and Nietzsche—to somehow forge a language about the coming of the postcolony from these disparate elements. Most of that is trying to search for spaces of legitimacy, for itinerant ways of doing things.

Could you talk about the untranslated and uncaptioned voices that speak on the soundtrack in the film?

I love dirges as a song form. I love their lamentative quality, because of the insinuation of elegy that they bring to things. Take that Frantz [Fanon] phrase at the beginning of Transfigured Night, 'What can we say when we can't speak anymore, when we have to speak but don't know what more we can say?' What can we say when the condition of wordlessness, as Nietzsche would put it, is absolutely the preferred option? As I said, I try to persuade things to move into other spaces in which they can acquire a new garment of identity.

John Akomfrah, Transfigured Night (2013) (Still). Two-channel HD video installation, colour, 5.1 sound. 26 min 31 sec. © Smoking Dogs Films. Courtesy Lisson Gallery.

People approached these ethnographic recordings done by field recorders, which are now stored in the British Museum, from the angle of the folkloric or the ethnographic. It seemed interesting to me to persuade them to speak to the theme of a [Arnold Schoenberg] project. I took the whole Transfigured Night premise from Schoenberg, and it's such a wonderful idea, because in the short story a man, with his loved one, takes a walk on a moonlit night and the woman says, 'listen I'm carrying a child, I do love you, but I'm carrying a child, and the child is not yours.' In other words, 'I come to this union in a state of "imperfection," because I've been inseminated by someone else.' And he said, 'you have to find the courage'—as most colonial subjects must do when they first encounter the postcolonial state. They have to say to the postcolonial state, 'yes, we love the thought and the idea of it so much that we are happy to be in this union with you. Even though we know of these imperfections, we are happy to be in this union because we believe we will make something new, the child will be ours, we will look after it as our own, and this new country will be great.'

It seems to me that these are the claims of fidelity that the postcolonial subject made to the postcolonial state. The postcolonial state generally said, in this slight hybrid form, 'if you believe me we can adapt.' Certainly, my parents did, as did the parents of most people I know. We all turned up on the day of independence, waved our flags, clapped, and said: 'Yes, we'll come along with you on this project.' But on that night of transfiguration, the pact and the union failed. What can you say about these things now except for lamentation and elegy? What do you say except to lament the passing of the moment?

John Akomfrah, Vertigo Sea (2015). Exhibition view: John Akomfrah: Signs of Empire, New Museum, New York (20 June–2 September 2018). Courtesy Smoking Dogs Films and Lisson Gallery. Photo: Maris Hutchinson / EPW Studio.

Could you discuss the disparate narratives in Vertigo Sea, which you tie together to reveal this continuing importance of the sea in today's migration crisis, amongst other things?

In part, this started because I wanted to register a change in the utopian project of migration. When you look at the young 22-year-old Nigerian man whose voice opens Vertigo Sea—talking about being trapped at sea and hanging on to a tuna net—the idea which propelled his desire to move away is pretty much the same as my mother's, in the sense that these are two individuals separated by five or six decades, each of whom believe the elsewhere held the promise of decadence. But the conditions that underscored the journeys are two very different ones. My mother arrived in the relative comfort of a ship to Britain and this man was stuck in a pirogue that stood very little chance of making it across the Mediterranean.

These registers of danger suggested the need to return to questions of the sea with multiple lenses to see how many forms of subjectivity can be located in it. I was trying to locate a series of episodes in which particular kinds of subjectivities could be isolated.

John Akomfrah, Vertigo Sea (2015). Three-channel HD video installation, 7.1 sound, colour. 48 min 30 sec. © Smoking Dogs Films. Courtesy Lisson Gallery.

I also think there's a way in which we have to be very modernist, in the sense that we need to know what is not possible anymore. Or rather, we need to teach ourselves to speak in a very different way about questions of subjectivity, because holding on to the notion that there is absolute demarcation between the lives and misfortunes of the humpbacked whale and the enslaved African in the 16th centuryis a mistake. There are overlaps and striking affinities between those lives that can only be recognised if you get rid of this idealist assumption that there is a hierarchy of subjectivity, at the apex of which sits the human.

This was a very important experiment for me—trying to do a project in which different states of subjectivity across species demarcations can be brought in to a kind of affective proximity.

John Akomfrah, Vertigo Sea (2015) (Still). Three-channel HD video installation, 7.1 sound, colour. 48 min 30 sec. © Smoking Dogs Films. Courtesy Lisson Gallery.

How do you deal with images that display human suffering, while understanding the limits of representation and the ethics of dealing with histories that have greatly affected lives and communities around the world? You handle your narratives and characters very delicately, this is certain.

There's a part in The Unfinished Conversation where the conundrum of what I do is writ large. It's in Vietnam in 1966, a woman has stepped on a landmine and she's had her legs blown off. They've been amputated, and she's been taken back to the hospital, where the amputation had taken place, so they can check to see if she's ok. When she arrives, there is a BBC TV crew there and they see her being carried into the hospital. They follow her in a kind of handheld shot into the ward where they proceed to film her. No one has asked her for permission, she is absolutely embarrassed, because she is clearly at her most vulnerable, and they proceed to film her.

Now, as you look at this young woman—she must be at most 19—you find that she begins to discover agency. At some point you see her make the choice to not disavow against the filming, but to engage and use it in order to say something about herself. It is one of the reasons I am really interested in moments of un-becoming. It seems to me that there's a kind of romantic fantasy that we attach to becoming. People say the only kind of image worth looking at is when people are on top, happy, winning, struggling, marching on to the future and so on, because the assumption is that those are the only times when human or nonhuman agency can be seen at work. I don't agree with that.

Akomfrah, The Unfinished Conversation (2012). Exhibition view: John Akomfrah: Signs of Empire, New Museum, New York (20 June–2 September 2018). Courtesy Smoking Dogs Films and Lisson Gallery. Photo: Maris Hutchinson / EPW Studio.

When you have 20 tonnes of whale lying there dead being hacked to bits, the fact that the people who are hacking it to bits are so small and are able to do what they're doing in that moment of death is both a statement by the humpbacked whale as well as the people who are doing it. The fact that something is inanimate does not mean it is not speaking or saying something. The fact that someone is dead does not mean they are not saying something. And the fact that we are witnessing moments of their un-becoming is as powerful and as revealing as the moments of their becoming, if I can put it that way.

I understand that there are moments when these things are uneasy for people, and I understand that there are ethical questions at stake. One has to be mindful of the question of the photographic, but I don't think those questions should circumscribe and prescribe the status we go into, especially when what we are looking for are signs of life. And I think signs of life can be found even in moments of death.—[O]

{{article.backToTitle ? article.backToTitle : 'Back to Conversations'}}



{{currentArtwork.Medium}}{{currentArtwork.Medium && currentArtwork.Medium.substring(currentArtwork.Medium.length -1) != ',' && currentArtwork.Edition ? ',' : ''}} {{currentArtwork.Edition}}



Follow favourite artists and galleries, be notified of new artworks and exhibitions, use our price enquiry service and receive the Ocula newsletter. It's free.

Sign Up
 Sign Up with Facebook
By signing up you accept our Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy and to
receiving the Ocula e-newsletter. Registration with Ocula is free.


Scan the QR Code via WeChat to follow Ocula's official account.

iCal GoogleYahooOutlook